<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I’ll Look at Yours If You’ll Look at Mine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novelr.com/2007/08/04/i%e2%80%99ll-look-at-yours-if-you%e2%80%99ll-look-at-mine/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/08/04/i%e2%80%99ll-look-at-yours-if-you%e2%80%99ll-look-at-mine</link>
	<description>Hacking Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Mentira</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/08/04/i%e2%80%99ll-look-at-yours-if-you%e2%80%99ll-look-at-mine/comment-page-1#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Mentira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/archives/i%e2%80%99ll-look-at-yours-if-you%e2%80%99ll-look-at-mine#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>Gloria;

Thank you for posting your comments and your perspective. While I agree in numerous points you make, I however, reserve the right to disagree with you on others. I have been reading your work, and find it well written, yet simplistic in nature. While the characters are developed, I find that they are very two-dimensional, and the situations very artificial. I have read your articles, and continue to follow your work, and have seen much of the same type of writing. I encourage you to continue, and I like to see the amount of effort that you put in your work. 
I will concur, novel writing or fictional writing is a very difficult &quot;nut to crack,&quot; yet, if you continue, I am sure that your writing will improve, and perhaps you will attain your goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gloria;</p>
<p>Thank you for posting your comments and your perspective. While I agree in numerous points you make, I however, reserve the right to disagree with you on others. I have been reading your work, and find it well written, yet simplistic in nature. While the characters are developed, I find that they are very two-dimensional, and the situations very artificial. I have read your articles, and continue to follow your work, and have seen much of the same type of writing. I encourage you to continue, and I like to see the amount of effort that you put in your work.<br />
I will concur, novel writing or fictional writing is a very difficult &#8220;nut to crack,&#8221; yet, if you continue, I am sure that your writing will improve, and perhaps you will attain your goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/08/04/i%e2%80%99ll-look-at-yours-if-you%e2%80%99ll-look-at-mine/comment-page-1#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/archives/i%e2%80%99ll-look-at-yours-if-you%e2%80%99ll-look-at-mine#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Gloria,

That&#039;s a really interesting post. By-and-large I think you&#039;re right. I have a few--fairly random--thoughts...

&#039;I am more interested in my work than I am in yours.&#039; This is both true and untrue. Writing is, generally speaking, a very egotistical and egocentric passtime. I&#039;m deeply invested in everything I write--and only a fraction of that ever sees the light of day on my blog!

On the other hand, as a writer, I&#039;m always reading. And everything I read is, to a greater or lesser extent, a learning experience. Some (well, okay, many) writers are better than me, and those writers I study closely to see what I can do to improve my own fiction. In this way, I learn just about as much from reading Stephen King as I do Tolstoy. Obviously, I learn completely different things from both.

Your blog, Gloria, is a prime example of a piece of online fiction that has taught me a lot. For instance, I was quite worried about having slower sections in my blog which examined the characters motivations and emotions until I saw that you&#039;d achieved exactly this while remaining compelling reading.

Of course, there&#039;s a lot of chaff out there. As with any blogging community, we need to wade through 100 rubbish blogs to find the 3 or 4 good ones. That seems to be a problem common to the whole blogosphere (there&#039;s another unlovely word for you).

So I do think there&#039;s a lot to be gained by developing a community--a space where we can all exist. Selfishly, one would be of great benefit to me: my writing will improve and it may well help my visibility to publishers.

And to turn to your final point, you are absolutely right: the impetus to do this has to come from us. No one else is going to do this for us because, frankly, we&#039;re very low profile and at the moment very few people see the benefits of reading fiction online.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gloria,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a really interesting post. By-and-large I think you&#8217;re right. I have a few&#8211;fairly random&#8211;thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8216;I am more interested in my work than I am in yours.&#8217; This is both true and untrue. Writing is, generally speaking, a very egotistical and egocentric passtime. I&#8217;m deeply invested in everything I write&#8211;and only a fraction of that ever sees the light of day on my blog!</p>
<p>On the other hand, as a writer, I&#8217;m always reading. And everything I read is, to a greater or lesser extent, a learning experience. Some (well, okay, many) writers are better than me, and those writers I study closely to see what I can do to improve my own fiction. In this way, I learn just about as much from reading Stephen King as I do Tolstoy. Obviously, I learn completely different things from both.</p>
<p>Your blog, Gloria, is a prime example of a piece of online fiction that has taught me a lot. For instance, I was quite worried about having slower sections in my blog which examined the characters motivations and emotions until I saw that you&#8217;d achieved exactly this while remaining compelling reading.</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s a lot of chaff out there. As with any blogging community, we need to wade through 100 rubbish blogs to find the 3 or 4 good ones. That seems to be a problem common to the whole blogosphere (there&#8217;s another unlovely word for you).</p>
<p>So I do think there&#8217;s a lot to be gained by developing a community&#8211;a space where we can all exist. Selfishly, one would be of great benefit to me: my writing will improve and it may well help my visibility to publishers.</p>
<p>And to turn to your final point, you are absolutely right: the impetus to do this has to come from us. No one else is going to do this for us because, frankly, we&#8217;re very low profile and at the moment very few people see the benefits of reading fiction online.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

