<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Editing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing</link>
	<description>Hacking Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blair Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing/comment-page-1#comment-6652</link>
		<dc:creator>Blair Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing#comment-6652</guid>
		<description>Whilst self editing is one of the most important skills an author can learn, I think that having an outside source of editing is also important. How often can a writer get so caught up within a story that they begin to illustrate a story that shades itself in nothing but black and white to the reader whilst seeming to be of a techno-colour spectrum within the writers eyes. Having someone work with you from start to finish is something that I find amazingly helpful. Others may read and give suggestions but I think just as you need to have that constant flow of story line and character, wavering slightly but of course always keeping to something of a general plot, your editing needs to be much of the same as well. If this doesn&#039;t happen then you&#039;re likely to have a story that whilst good will be irregular with it&#039;s story telling and will not turn out to be as true to itself and it&#039;s characters as it could be. 

So yes, I beleive that the middle man needs to have less of a hand in what is said, but alas that man (or woman) should still stay, to give at least a little guidance here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst self editing is one of the most important skills an author can learn, I think that having an outside source of editing is also important. How often can a writer get so caught up within a story that they begin to illustrate a story that shades itself in nothing but black and white to the reader whilst seeming to be of a techno-colour spectrum within the writers eyes. Having someone work with you from start to finish is something that I find amazingly helpful. Others may read and give suggestions but I think just as you need to have that constant flow of story line and character, wavering slightly but of course always keeping to something of a general plot, your editing needs to be much of the same as well. If this doesn&#8217;t happen then you&#8217;re likely to have a story that whilst good will be irregular with it&#8217;s story telling and will not turn out to be as true to itself and it&#8217;s characters as it could be. </p>
<p>So yes, I beleive that the middle man needs to have less of a hand in what is said, but alas that man (or woman) should still stay, to give at least a little guidance here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novelr : Loose Leaf Stories</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing/comment-page-1#comment-6077</link>
		<dc:creator>Novelr : Loose Leaf Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing#comment-6077</guid>
		<description>[...] On Editing, by L. Lee Lowe: A short post in favor of self-editing. We&#8217;re really fixating on webfiction and the lack of editors, aren&#8217;t we? Sometimes I think I&#8217;m the only writer in the world who likes having editors. I incredibly grateful to you ladies! And my co-authoring/editing machine of a husband. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Editing, by L. Lee Lowe: A short post in favor of self-editing. We&#8217;re really fixating on webfiction and the lack of editors, aren&#8217;t we? Sometimes I think I&#8217;m the only writer in the world who likes having editors. I incredibly grateful to you ladies! And my co-authoring/editing machine of a husband. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli James</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing/comment-page-1#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t write online to escape editorial constraints, probably because I actively search for editors and see what they have to say about my writing. Most of them don&#039;t give constructive criticism ... just outright rejection. But when it does I find myself growing. I am grateful to these editors - they take the time, and as a result of their efforts, my writing improves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t write online to escape editorial constraints, probably because I actively search for editors and see what they have to say about my writing. Most of them don&#8217;t give constructive criticism &#8230; just outright rejection. But when it does I find myself growing. I am grateful to these editors &#8211; they take the time, and as a result of their efforts, my writing improves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Poncy</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing/comment-page-1#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Poncy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/2007/10/16/on-editing#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>I agree with Lee, completely.  Well said.  While I am not adverse to getting published in the traditional manner, I also write for the reasons she gave, and online publishing is quite rewarding in that sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lee, completely.  Well said.  While I am not adverse to getting published in the traditional manner, I also write for the reasons she gave, and online publishing is quite rewarding in that sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

