<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small Crowds Aren&#8217;t Very Wise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novelr.com/2008/06/06/small-crowds-arent-very-wise/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novelr.com/2008/06/06/small-crowds-arent-very-wise</link>
	<description>Hacking Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miladysa</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2008/06/06/small-crowds-arent-very-wise/comment-page-1#comment-2984</link>
		<dc:creator>Miladysa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/?p=164#comment-2984</guid>
		<description>This is all news to me.   Thank you for bringing it to my attention.

I can see the point you are making although I lean more towards  Morgan&#039;s way of thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all news to me.   Thank you for bringing it to my attention.</p>
<p>I can see the point you are making although I lean more towards  Morgan&#8217;s way of thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli James</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2008/06/06/small-crowds-arent-very-wise/comment-page-1#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/?p=164#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>Then perhaps Lexy&#039;s suggestion to remove numerical scores in reviews is the best. At least, until the crowd becomes big enough, it should work.

I have no contention with fans. I do, however, have a problem with &lt;em&gt;fanboyist&lt;/em&gt; reviews - they are not objective and they do not help other people find the best stories in sites like PU. I agree that they have a right to say whether they like a story or not, but I believe fanboyist reviews is ultimately more detrimental to the credibility and effectiveness of a blook filter.

And, besides, fanboyism is easy enough to detect and get rid off - I&#039;m talking about very little substance and extremely high scores.

PS: I can think of many other publications that apply numerical scores to works in order to assist reader choice - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metacritic.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Metacritic&lt;/a&gt; is the first example that springs to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then perhaps Lexy&#8217;s suggestion to remove numerical scores in reviews is the best. At least, until the crowd becomes big enough, it should work.</p>
<p>I have no contention with fans. I do, however, have a problem with <em>fanboyist</em> reviews &#8211; they are not objective and they do not help other people find the best stories in sites like PU. I agree that they have a right to say whether they like a story or not, but I believe fanboyist reviews is ultimately more detrimental to the credibility and effectiveness of a blook filter.</p>
<p>And, besides, fanboyism is easy enough to detect and get rid off &#8211; I&#8217;m talking about very little substance and extremely high scores.</p>
<p>PS: I can think of many other publications that apply numerical scores to works in order to assist reader choice &#8211; <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/" rel="nofollow">Metacritic</a> is the first example that springs to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan O'Friel</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2008/06/06/small-crowds-arent-very-wise/comment-page-1#comment-2593</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan O'Friel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/?p=164#comment-2593</guid>
		<description>I agree with the basic premise of the article -- PU is a small fish in a big sea, and a fish that primarily devours only two types of food. Other groups are somewhat similar in that concept -- Epiguide is another &#039;home&#039; for web serials, though they specialize in the soap opera-style. 

However, I think the idea of having mods step in and take away &#039;fanboy&#039; ratings isn&#039;t a great one. Fans are readers, and they deserve to have a say in why they enjoy a series just as much as somewhat who didn&#039;t. Perhaps a better idea would be having mods who will take away malicious reviews, but then, how does one tell if a review is malicious or honest? Fiction tastes being as subjective as they are, I think that ascribing motives to reviewers is a quick way to get bunches less of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the basic premise of the article &#8212; PU is a small fish in a big sea, and a fish that primarily devours only two types of food. Other groups are somewhat similar in that concept &#8212; Epiguide is another &#8216;home&#8217; for web serials, though they specialize in the soap opera-style. </p>
<p>However, I think the idea of having mods step in and take away &#8216;fanboy&#8217; ratings isn&#8217;t a great one. Fans are readers, and they deserve to have a say in why they enjoy a series just as much as somewhat who didn&#8217;t. Perhaps a better idea would be having mods who will take away malicious reviews, but then, how does one tell if a review is malicious or honest? Fiction tastes being as subjective as they are, I think that ascribing motives to reviewers is a quick way to get bunches less of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli James</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2008/06/06/small-crowds-arent-very-wise/comment-page-1#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/?p=164#comment-2590</guid>
		<description>No problem, Adam. 

Headsup, though: Alexandra Erin has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pagesunbound.com/index.php?option=com_fireboard&amp;Itemid=26&amp;func=view&amp;id=735&amp;catid=12&amp;limit=10&amp;limitstart=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;somewhat addressed this issue&lt;/a&gt; by suggesting the removal of numerical scores in reviews. Interesting development, this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, Adam. </p>
<p>Headsup, though: Alexandra Erin has <a href="http://www.pagesunbound.com/index.php?option=com_fireboard&#038;Itemid=26&#038;func=view&#038;id=735&#038;catid=12&#038;limit=10&#038;limitstart=0" rel="nofollow">somewhat addressed this issue</a> by suggesting the removal of numerical scores in reviews. Interesting development, this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kamerer</title>
		<link>http://www.novelr.com/2008/06/06/small-crowds-arent-very-wise/comment-page-1#comment-2587</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kamerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novelr.com/?p=164#comment-2587</guid>
		<description>Great post with lots of good points. I certainly agree that as more and more people start reading online stories, the types of genres will blossom.

Thanks for the link, by the way.

-Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post with lots of good points. I certainly agree that as more and more people start reading online stories, the types of genres will blossom.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link, by the way.</p>
<p>-Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

