Worth a look and a laugh: a hundred year old article in defense of bad spelling. It’s amazing what the Internet drags up, sometimes. (via)
-
By Eli James
-

Why do you read online fiction? Why would you want to? Afterglow: a Novelr community project.
Advertise on Novelr
-
Must Reads
- Making Money From Online Fiction - I've Done It, So Can You
- The Ultimate Blook Guide: Blogging Your Book
- The Novelr Guide To eBook Formats
- How To Build Community Around Your Fiction
- 1000 True Fans: Making Money Off Your Blook
- 1000 True Fans And Online Fiction: The Truth
- Applying The Long Tail To Online Fiction
- A Format For Online Fiction
- Why Movies From Books Suck
- Top 10 Ways To Write An Anticlimax
- (Series): Design: Improving Readability Without Lifting A Pencil
- (Series): Choosing The Right Blogging Platform - For Authors
-
Topics
Novelr is an idea blog and a community rally point for Internet fiction, produced regularly since 2006. More?
-
RSS Feeds
-
Link Ads




2 Comments
Did people really feel the need to nearly fall upon their swords for misspelling, back then? And here I thought that illiteracy was more common in the past than the present. Granted, these days we’re plagued by chatspeak (and I don’t mean an innocent “lol” here and there, but entire sentences comprised of numbers and abbreviations) but I thought the complete inability to read or write was more common in 18th century. So you’d think that a misspelling would be more kindly looked upon, because at least you *could* write.
Ahh, good one, Sarah. I’d forgotten that literacy was much rarer back then than it is now. This article does seem logical when seen in that context.